Friday, May 29, 2020


๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ›ต๐Ÿฆ‹



Qq

Qq
Qqqqqq
Qqq
q
Q
Q
Q

Q
Qqq

Thursday, September 1, 2011

ALLUVIAL 'NEBULA' OUTWASH PLAIN:

a brief note to begin this journal is forwarded as follows:
written by this era of humanity's mystery messenger man.in connection to c5q79 of the fatidical functions of nostradamus of course.







http://youtu.be/HKWWOWgEkt4
humans today oftentimes are backwards on a certain matter. by which factor i now state the following. which is simply this. To humanity today. no where in christianity does christianity forbid a created being from saying a word in the english langauge addressed in abbreviated functions or abbreviated terms as the 'f' word.






now this is not to state that a created being should go out of his or her way to use profanity in this life, albeit when it comes to 'a created being' being 'for example' virtuously angry at , let us say, corruption or foolish hypocrisy, located in this existence, FOR EXAMPLE- the following needs to be clarified in writing 'right now. which is simply ONLY the following:






http://youtu.be/aJpKCnRHE0E
A RIGHTEOUS CHRISTIAN GOD UNDERSTANDS.
RIGHTEOUS ANGER GOD UNDERSTANDS.http://youtu.be/wrmNp8hFTE0
A RIGHTEOUS CHRISTIAN GOD, IN CONNECTION TO ISIAH 66; 5, LUKE 6; 45-46 OR ISIAH 65; 5 UNDERSTANDS THAT, AT TIMES, IN THIS LIFE, A TRUE CHRISTIAN OR A TRUE CHILD OF GOD, WHO HONORS GODS COMMANDMENTS MAY SAY A WORD HUMANS REFER TO AS FUCK IN THIS EXISTENCE.
ORIGIN IS AS FOLLOWS.http://youtu.be/hkoA3O3oLCU







SENESCENT ENGLISH 19TH CENTURY A D MEANING?
BRITISH COURTS FELT THAT IT WAS UNAPPROPRIATE TO USE THE TERM ADULTERY IN A COURT OF BRITISH LAW.







SO ENGLISH OFFICIALS PARLEYED A RULE THAT 'IN COURT, THOSE WORDS WE'RE NOT TO BE USED.http://youtu.be/GP-jWyu7IRE








HENCE BRITISH LAW ORDAINED A STATUTE IN MERRY OLD 19TH CENTURY ENGLAND WHICH STATED THAT, WHEN SOMEONE WAS CHARGED WITH BEING AN ADULTERER IN 19TH CENTURY BRITISH SOCIETIES, THE TERMS, FORNICATION UNDER CARNAL KNOWLEDGE, WAS SHORTENED TO THE ABBREVIATED TERM, ENTITLED F-U-C-K.
TO ADDRESS SUCH A CHARGE IN COURT.










http://youtu.be/yzsRy_fCcQw
FORWARD TO THE 21ST CENTURY.
THAT CONCEPT OF SENESCENT BRITISH LAW DOES NOT MEAN OR GUARANTEE THAT A PERSON IS EVIL FOR SAYING 'FUCK.

http://youtu.be/WRQQieBLCuQ
NOTE CLEARLY THAT OBVIOUSLY
THAT DOES NOT GAURANTEE THAT A TRUE CHRISTIAN IS DAMNED IN THIS LIFE.
http://youtu.be/0RxBHRZpIdg
NO WHERE IN CHRISTIANITY IN THIS LIFE DOES IT SAY THAT A TRUE CHRISTIAN IS DAMNED IF A TRUE CHRISTIAN EXPRESSES ANGER IN SUCH A MANNER IN THIS LIFE.
ESPECIALLY WHEN A TRUE CHRISTIAN EXPRESSES ANGER AGAINST CORRUPTION OR HYPOCRISY IN THIS LIFE.

SO?
ON THAT RATIONALLY ADDRESSED NOTE LET HUMANITY TODAY PERCEIVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ADDRESSED.
DECEPTIVE HYPOCRITES IN THIS LIFE, PRETENTIOUS TO TOTAL RIGHTEOUSNESS, IN PRACTICALLY EVERY WAY OBVIOUSLY DO NOT LIKE IT IF A RIGHTEOUS CHRISTIAN EXPRESSES ANGER AGAINST HYPOCRISY.










IN ANY FORMAT IN THIS LIFE.
IN OPPOSITION TO DEUTERONOMY 28; 58-59 OR MATTHEW 5; 17-20
DECEPTIVE HYPOCRITES RIDICULOUSLY EXPECT TRUE CHRISTIANS TO BLESS WHAT IS EVIL IN THIS LIFE.
CONTRARY TO WHAT JESUS CHRIST TEACHES TRUE CHRISTIANS IN MATTHEW 5: 17-20.
CONNECTION?
DEUTERONOMY 28. OBVIOUSLY.
SEE 2ND JOHN 1; 10-11.
OKAY. SO?
OBVIOUSLY
DECEPTIVE HYPOCRITES IN THIS LIFE, TALK PLEASANT WORDS EVERYWHERE.
SEE PSALM 62; 4 OR PSALM 64; 2 OR PSALM 55; 21 OR EZEKIEL 33; 31-33 REGARDING THAT FUNCTION OF THIS EXISTENCE.









http://youtu.be/0J78q9w13yU
LIKEWISE. SO?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI2CGt0hVGU&feature=share&list=PL12C5DDF507BBF419
THOSE ARE THE GENERAL ISSUES TO THAT FUNCTION LOCATED WITHIN THIS EXISTENCE. CLEAR AND SIMPLE AS WELL AS STRAIGHT TO THE POINT OF TRUTH. ENTIRELY IN FULL.http://youtu.be/XfGwjHg9gyU









ALBEIT, NOW THAT THE PRECEDING INFORMATION ADDRESSED HAS BEEN APPROPRIATELY CLARIFIED IN REDACTION, I NOW WISH HUMANITY IN THIS EXISTENCE TO TALLY THE FOLLOWING TRUTH ALSO, ATTACHED TO THIS TINY BRIEF NOTE FORWARDED UPON THIS WEBSITE.http://youtu.be/V9N8Pv3iJ7c
COMPUTED SPIRITUALLY IN LOGIC IN THIS MANNER ADDRESSED.  






TO HUMANITY, IN THIS LIFE PRESENTLY, I MUST STRESS , REGARDING THIS MATTER THAT 'TRUE CHRISTIANS DO NOT USE PROFANITY FOR NO RIGHTEOUS PURPOSE. 








IN FACT TRUE CHRISTIANS, WHO HONOR CHRIST IN THIS LIFE SEEK TO AVOID PROFANITY.
OUT OF RESPECT FOR WHAT JESUS CHRIST TEACHES HUMANITY IN MATTHEW CHAPTER TEN.      music option clickhttps://www.box.com/s/btmh1xu4b347mnmtv2re
OBVIOUSLY.http://youtu.be/I32qE5UIz0Y
OBVIOUSLYhttp://youtu.be/1rzaYa_gm1g









BE SLY AS SERPENTS BUT AS GENTLE AS DOVES. WHEN POSSIBLE. IT COMES DOWN TO COMMON SENSE, FOLKS.http://youtu.be/4AD5fX4sveo
A PERSON IS NOT EVIL IF A PERSON SHOWS ANGER FOR HYPOCRISY IN THIS LIFE BY SAYING 'FUCK.







IN FRUSTRATION TOWARDS WICKEDNESS.






http://youtu.be/3urFCshqmbQ







OBVIOUSLY GOD DOES NOT HOLD THAT CONCEPT AGAINST A TRUE CHRISTIAN WHO SEEKS TO KEEP GODS COMMANDMENTS APPROPRIATELY IN TRUE LOVE IN THIS LIFE.








ALBEIT OBVIOUSLY A TRUE CHRISTIAN ALSO DOES NOT GO OUT OF HIS OR HER WAY TO USE PROFANITY NEITHER IN THIS EXISTENCE.
OBVIOUSLY.http://youtu.be/x7Rbiwh-hDM









USE YOUR HEADS TO THINK, PEOPLE. AS MATTHEW 24; 51 CONNECTED TO ISIAH 65; 5 DECREES.http://youtu.be/pfmyR2n7ax0







SAYING WHAT HUMANS ADDRESS AS THE 'F; WORD, REGARDING A HUMAN LANGAUGE ADDRESSED AS ENGLISH IN THIS LIFE IS NOT BREAKING GODS COMMANDMENTS, IRREFUTABLY.http://youtu.be/j7M8WYIrsVo
OBVIOUSLY LOGIC DICTATES THE PRECEDING INFORMATION TO BE CORRECT.
NOTE EXODUS 20; 3-17.








PERCEIVE JOHN 14; 15. CALCULATE REVELATION 22; 11-15.






THEN DENOTE THE MANNER IN WHICH SOMEONE EXPREESSES ANYTHING IN THIS LIFE.









THAT IS WHAT BREAKS OR KEEPS GODS COMMANDMENTS.
http://youtu.be/UyqGfGBs3mc
SOMEWHAT IN CONNECTION TO WHAT THE LORD JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF TEACHES ALL MANKIND IN MATTHEW 15; 1-14 IS HOW SUCH A FUNCTION IS PRESENTLY PRESCRIBED IN WRITING IN THIS LIFE.
http://youtu.be/KAWmIUtJ4O8
BY THIS WEBSITE WRITER. ULTIMATELY ASTUTELYhttp://youtu.be/ASJy3c4ACiU.
NOTE THE PRECEDING LOGIC, IN DETAIL, IN FULL. music option click herehttps://www.box.com/s/gmdxmxszu1mwwhtaq1nc










































































































































































No comments:

Q



















https://youtu.be/gOctASdG59U

4 comments:




  1. Sometimes I think about things.
    Ya know?

    Shaun?



    And I ponder the functions of life.
    All mixed together.




    Religion, politics astrology, etc.



    And today all the functions of life have me asking this question.




    Regarding the world of mother nature and the animal kingdom, connected to an interesting part of christianity, here, now is something to consider.



    It is known in the animal kingdom, that, in mating season, if a female adult lion is not completely submissive to the male adult lion mating with her, at times, she is at risk of the male lion literally killing her.




    Then , after that, that male lion, just goes and finds another female lion to mate with.
    Right after he kills the uncooperative female lion.



    .
    That's a fact.




    She has to be completely submissive.
    During mating season

    Or she'll probably be killed by the male lion.
    In nature.


    That's actually a fact.








    ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฆ•๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘บ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฅถ๐Ÿฆˆ๐ŸŒ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿฆ













    ReplyDelete









  2. ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฆ•๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘บ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฅถ๐Ÿฆˆ๐ŸŒ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿฆ










    So, my question to that statement is this.

    In alignment to that factual concept in nature, why, therefore, does christianity state that jesus is the ferocious harsh lion of the tribe of judah?



    ๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿคซ
    In summary, that is what christianity teaches.

    Christ is a harsh lord to created beings who deliberately hypocritically dishonor the ten decent commandments of christianity in this life ...



    Many christian scriptures confirm jesus is harsh to hypocrites who play hypocritical games.



    That's irrefutable.
    According to everything christianity teaches.
    So?..๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿคก๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿท๐ŸŠ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿฅถ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿฅณ




    Does that make sense?

    Righteously?





    ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿคก๐Ÿคซ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿท๐Ÿ’๐Ÿฅถ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿ‘จ‍๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿ™€๐Ÿคก
    To condemn hypocrisy like that?





    What is the definition to a hypocrite?
    Exactly.
    And why would jesus be called the LION OF THE TRIBE OF JUDAH, if facts, in this life confirm male lions kill females who are not completely obedient during mating season for lions in this life?๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ’๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿญ




    I address the appropriate answers to these questions in my websites to humans.๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿ‘จ‍๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿฐ




    Albeit regardless,
    These are good questions for mortals to ponder.
    At any time.
    In this life...
    Regardless.
    Exactly.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿ‘จ‍๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ’ฉ



    ReplyDelete


  3. Saint petie refers to the fact in 1st peter 5: 8, that satan roams earth like a raging lion.๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿฆš๐Ÿ•Ž๐Ÿ™€๐Ÿ˜ฑ

    Seeking to kill.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿ’ฉ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿฅถ
    ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿฆ•๐Ÿฆˆ๐ŸŒ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿฆˆ๐Ÿฆ•๐Ÿฆ•๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿฅถ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ’
    And be wild.๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฆ„๐Ÿคช

    Yet saint john refers people to the fact that the lord jesus seeks to kill satan's followers in revelation 5: 5.๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿฅ›๐Ÿบ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ‰๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿฃ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ‰๐Ÿ‘บ๐Ÿคซ
    Connected to matthew 26: 41.
    Which says followers of the devil are christs enemies.๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿญ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿธ๐Ÿท๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿฆ–
    And the book of revelation says๐Ÿคช๐Ÿคฏ christ wars against such beings.๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ’ฎ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฆ

    Yet, both passages of scripture refer to satan and jesus being wild as lions๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ‰๐Ÿธ๐Ÿฆ„๐ŸŽ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿท๐Ÿฆ“๐Ÿผ๐Ÿน๐Ÿฆ„๐Ÿฆ

    Is that contradiction?๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿˆ
    .
    if what I address in this website is factual, which the facts of this life, parley is correct, then obviously the preceding so called contradiction does not really amount to a real contradiction.
    ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿ”ฏ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ‰๐Ÿถ๐Ÿฆ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿท๐Ÿ‰๐Ÿ’ฎ๐Ÿ˜
    Obviously.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the scriptures jesus says
    in matthew 19, none should be called,
    good.
    Except god or rather,
    the father of jesus.

    Yet saint paul says in
    1st timothy 4 verse 4
    about,
    that " all is good
    and nothing is to be
    rejected,
    if it received with thanksgiving""

    So.
    Is that a contradiction?

    Maybe.

    Yet probably not.

    Saint paul just uses the word

    ""Good"""
    To refer to the fact
    God the father
    Is making food good.
    If it is received respectfully, with Thanksgiving..
    Through jesus.

    ReplyDelete

The contradiction attached to christs mustard in the Christian scriptures in this existence

  The earliest description of orchid seedlings (Orchis morio and Bletia verecunda), was by the British botanist, R. A. Salisbury, in a paper...